path: root/MAINTAINERS.md

Triaging issues
---------------

Issue tracker: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/issues

Help other maintainers with the triage following these guidelines. This way, it
will be easier to find issues that require attention.

- Workflow: indicate the current stage with the corresponding label:

  - `workflow::triage`: needs triage to determine whether is a bug, an RFE or we
    should close it.

  - `workflow::investigation`: has been triaged but more info is needed to start
    working on a fix. This step can be skipped if enough information is provided
    during triage.

  - `workflow::devel`: on development (or waiting for it).

  - Closed: the issue is already solved, either via a code fix or via providing
    the required info. Also if the request is clearly incorrect or doesn't fit
    at all in the project.

- Assignee: assign the issue to the person that is working on it. This will
  remove the `unassigned` and `help-needed::*` labels.

- Manual labels: add suitable labels to indicate the state of open issues:

  - `need-info`: waiting for info or feedback from anyone.

  - `good-first-issue`: the task is simple and well suited for a first time
    contributor.

  - `triaged::bug` / `triaged::RFE`: type of issue.

  - `need-discussion`: something is not clear about what to do, or about if
    something has to be done at all. The problem should be discussed by the
    maintainers and/or with the reporter and/or other interested parts.

  - `blocked`: the issue is waiting for something that blocks its progress

  - `close-proposed`: there are good reasons to reject the request (explain
    those reasons when adding the label) but a chance to others to provide
    reasons against it is desired.  
    It is not mandatory to always use this tag.
  
  - `Spam`: mark as spam, blocking the author. See [damspam](https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/freedesktop/damspam/-/blob/main/README.md?ref_type=heads).

- Automatic labels: some labels are automatically added and removed by a bot and
  the maintainers don't need to care much about them. The label `stale` is
  used for issues without activity for a long time. The labels `unassigned` and
  `help-needed::{triage, investigation, devel}` are used for issues without an
  assignee.


Merging Merge Requests
----------------------

- almost all new code, gets merged to `main` branch only. Stable branches only
  receive backports via `git cherry-pick -x`.

- almost always, make sure that the merge request is rebased against current
  `main` branch.

- if the merge request contains multiple patches, create a `--no-ff` merge
  request that envelop the patches. The merge commit can have a trivial commit
message like "area: merge branch 'xy/topic'" and refer to all relevant
resources. At least the full URL to the gitlab merge request should be there.

- for single patches, the merge commit can be skipped. In that case, add the
  full URL to the commit message before merging.

- before merging the result to `main`, make again sure that the merge request
  is up-to date (in particular, if you just rebased the branch or amended the
commit message). So usually first do a `git push origin -f -o ci.skip` to
update the merge request one more time, and the push the merge request to
`main`. The result is that the merge request in gitlab is shown as "Merged".

- always refer to relevant URLs (bugzilla, gitlab issues, gitlab merge
  request).  Do so via full URLs, not abbreviations like "!XYZ", so that the
URL is clickable in the browser.  Note that while the merge request is still
under review and being reworked, we will frequently force push the branch.
Gitlab and github will create backlinks to full URLs, so we want not to specify
those URLs while development, but the moment before merging, we will add them.
This means, usually when we decide that a merge request is ready to be merged,
we still need to rebase it to latest main and amend the commit messages. Then
we usually need to push once more to the merge-request, before pushing the
final result to `main`.

The purpose of this elaborate scheme is to get a clean history that is easy
to review and links to relevant resources.

If you forget to mention an URL, you can do so afterwards via `git-notes`.
See [CONTRIBUTING.md](CONTRIBUTING.md#git-notes-refsnotesbugs).


Upstream backports
---------------------------

There are situations where it is necessary to backport a patch to an earlier
version of NetworkManager.

In order to do the backport, use `git cherry-pick -x`. Please use the commit
from the next stable branch. If the commit is not on that branch then it is also
necessary to backport to that branch.

Example:

We want to backport commit 323e18276894591712a5e29f6e907562c79c5216 from `main`
(1.33) branch to `nm-1-30` branch. In order to do that, we must search if this
bug has been backported to 1.32.

`git log --all --grep "323e18276894591712a5e29f6e907562c79c5216"`

In case the backport to 1.32 is missing it would not show anything so please do
the backport to 1.32 first.

If the backport is done, the output should be similar to:

```
commit c94b1c43d4b5c5b88d67d7966d23a005028e78d8
Author: Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Sep 1 09:30:29 2021 +0200

    cloud-setup: return structure for get_config() result instead of generic hash table

    Returning a struct seems easier to understand, because then the result
    is typed.

    Also, we might return additional results, which are system wide and not
    per-interface.

    (cherry picked from commit 323e18276894591712a5e29f6e907562c79c5216)
```

In this case, the commit that should be backported is
c94b1c43d4b5c5b88d67d7966d23a005028e78d8.

### Resolving conflicts

To find conflicts when doing a backporting in NetworkManager is very common but
we do not resolve the conflicts manually. Instead, we abort the current
cherry-pick and search for the commit that introduced the changes that are
causing the conflict and backport it too.

We only resolve the conflict manually if the extra commit introduces a lot of
unnecessary changes or excesive code changes which is not common.

### Backporting API

NetworkManager allows the users to build their application against the latest
stable release and then run it against a newer release without relinking. To
allow this, we need to guarantee that after we release a version that includes a
new libnm linker version, then any release done after that point with a higher
version number contains that linker version with the same symbols.

In practice when we want to backport new API from main we have two options:

- if the new API hasn't been included in a stable release of NetworkManager,
  then we can just backport the API to the old branch and pretend it was
  introduced there. For example, 8763e6da9c5adb3c4ccf3b2713dbcc25a91c5ede
  introduces new API on main during the 1.21 development cycle; 1.22 is not
  released yet. Then the symbol is backported to nm-1-20 before 1.20.6 with
  commit 90671a30b771d418953bd021d50c3cc43f253e6e. The symbol on main branch is
  then adjusted with 551fd3e28f6b142bd57eefacfaf96b8fb8e309dd. Note that at this
  point 1.20.6 must be released before 1.22.0.

- if the new API is already included in a stable release, we backport the API to
  the old branch and then duplicate the symbol on main with both versions. For
  example, 2e2ff6f27aa1bfa7a27d49980b319873240ec84b introduces new API on main,
  which is released as 1.12.0. The API is backported to 1.10.14 in commit
  19d7e66099ee43f47d6be0e740dc710fc365d200. Then, on main we add duplicate
  symbols with commit 5eade4da11ee38a0e7faf4a87b2c2b5af07c5eeb.


NetworkManager release process
------------------------------

It's mostly automated by [release.sh](contrib/fedora/rpm/release.sh).

Before running the script:
- For stable releases, remember to backport all commits with "Fixes:" tag that
  are applicable. Use the [find-backports](contrib/scripts/find-backports)
  script to find them.
- Start all the jobs in the latest Gitlab pipeline of the right branch. The
  script checks that they ran successfully.  
  Tiers 1 and 2 must pass, failed Tier 3 jobs can be fixed after the release.

The script also takes care of choosing the right version number depending on the
release type that you specify, like devel, rc1, rc, major, major-post, etc.
Run the script with `--help` to see all options.

Notes:
- You need a private token from gitlab.freedesktop.org with 'api' level access
  to the project. It can be saved to `~/.config/nm-release-token` or passed to
  the `--gitlab-token` argument of `release.sh`.
- The GPG key used to sign the tags must be exported to a keyserver.

Versioning scheme, automatically handled by the script (version numbers are
called MAJOR.MINOR.MICRO):
- Development releases has an odd MINOR version number (i.e. `1.47.2`).
- Stable releases has an even MINOR version number (i.e. `1.48.1`).
- Release candidates (RC) are tagged like `1.48-rc1`, `1.48-rc2`, etc. But in
  NM's internal code they looks like `1.47.90`, `1.47.91`, etc. (MINOR is one
  number less, and MICRO is >= 90).

The main differences between the different kind of releases are:
- Development releases: for development and testing purposes only.
- Release candidates (RC): stabilization phase before a stable release. Normally
  there are one or two RCs with ~2 weeks cadence. More RCs can be releases if
  they are needed.
- Stable releases: Releases within the same stable branch should remain very
  stable while fixing important bugs, backported from `main`. New features are
  added very rarely.

Stable branches are branched out from `main` to prepare the first release
candidate (RC) of the next stable branch. These branches are called `nm-MAJOR-MINOR`
(i.e. `nm-1-48`). As they are used to release stable versions, the last number
is always even.

There are some additional tasks that the script doesn't handle:
- For RC releases:
  - The NEWS file should reflect a curated summary of the changes that the new
    stable release will include.
  - The release should be announced on the mailing list.
- For stable releases:
  - The official documentation must be updated on the website when there is a new
    stable release. Use the [import-docs.sh](https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/networkmanager.pages.freedesktop.org/-/blob/main/scripts/import-docs.sh)
    script from the website's repo.
  - The release should be announced on the mailing list.


VPN plugins and nm-applet release process
-----------------------------------------

The same versioning scheme and release process is used for the VPN plugins,
nm-applet (including nm-connection-editor) and libnma.

Note that each of them is hosted in its own repository, but this is documented
here to avoid duplication, as the process is the same for all (at least for
those that we maintain).

Also note that there are no stable branches or development versions. Everything
is developed on main, and releases are done on main.

Versioning scheme (version numbers are called MAJOR.MINOR.MICRO):
- Small changes increments only the MICRO number.
- Bigger changes or new features increments the MINOR number.
- There is no strict criteria to define what change is small or big, but try to
  adhere mostly to [semantic versioning](https://semver.org/).
- Use only even numbers for MINOR, skipping odd ones. That way we use the same
  versioning scheme than the main NM project despite there are no development
  versions here.

Before starting:
- You need to have the maintainer role in the project.
- The GPG key used to sign the release must be added to your GNOME's Gitlab
  profile and uploaded to a keyserver.
- All details: https://handbook.gnome.org/maintainers/making-a-release.html

When doing a release, follow this process:
1. Ensure that `NEWS` file is up to date.
2. Increment the version in `meson.build` or `configure.ac`.
3. Commit and push to the `main` branch.
4. Check that the Gitlab's pipeline finishes without errors.
5. Tag the commit with a signed tag. Example: `git tag -s 1.2.8 -m 'Release 1.2.8'`.
6. Push the tag. Example: `git push origin 1.2.8`.  
   WARN: this is what starts the automatic CI release. As GNOME doesn't allow
   to delete tags, any error detected after this will force a new version bump.
7. Check that the Gitlab's pipeline finishes without errors. If that happens,
   the release is done and available both in the Gitlab's releases section and
   https://download.gnome.org/sources/*
8. Announce the release on the mailing list.

Notes:
- You need access to master.gnome.org, see [here](https://handbook.gnome.org/infrastructure/accounts.html).
- The GPG key used to sign the tags must be exported to a keyserver.


Reimporting systemd
-------------------

See [here](src/libnm-systemd-shared/README.md#reimport-upstream-code).


Copr repository
---------------

See [here](contrib/scripts/nm-copr-build.sh).


Gitlab-ci Pipelines
-------------------

See [here](.gitlab-ci/README.md).